>>Now I have a question. If string cutting of iron V bars is such a >>horrible problem, why isn't it such a horrible problem in agraffes? > >I think it is Ron, but the symptom (string noise) as it appears in the >capo-with-front-duplex sections doesn't present to the same degree in the >agraffed section, since the (usually) shorter free string length between >the agraffe and the bearing felt or bearing bar reduces the ability for >string noise to develop. Mind you, many agraffes do present with a slight >'zing' which is directly attributable to poorly shaped or deformed string >holes. > >Notice that upright pianos are far less subject to string noise, yet the V >bars in many cases are quite poorly shaped. Furthermore, the pressure bar >is often of a quite large radius also. Nevertheless the shorter free >length between the V bar and pressure bar tends to control string noise. Hi Ron, This was where I as going with this - that V bar shape or hardness isn't the only, or necessarily the prime reason for rendering and noise problems. Will a wider radius V bar with no specific hardening having been done to it give as good or better performance than the softer agraffe with even wider radius termination? I think it surely will if the counterbearing angle is right, and the front duplex length is short. >I don't regard the bar itself to be a critical factor, but when someone >else designed the plate you are using (and that someone designed the plate >such that the bearing felt was too far away from the agraffe), it becomes >necessary to add a bar to achieve the shorter string free length. > >Ron O There are always some sorts of limitations we have to work around. We just tend (hope) to upgrade our limitations and refine our work arounds as we go. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC