For some reason, I just FEEL this post coming!! :-) Avery At 02:07 PM 01/05/03 -0500, you wrote: >In a message dated 1/5/03 12:36:31 PM Central Standard Time, >tomtuner@attbi.com writes: > > >>List, >> Not to open a can of worms here, and I preface my comment by >>telling you I'm not a "digital keyboard" ,guy but even a low cost >>digital would be more productive for a beginner than a Whitney that is >>difficult to tune, has horrid stability problems , awful tone and an >>action that has poor performance at best. If there is a reason why >>Kimball is gone the Whitney may give a clue.Just my opinion . >> Tom Driscoll RPT > > >Funny, I never had any of these problems. Kimball is still in business >and making a profit. The Whitney piano will last longer than all of those >on here who have condemned it. If it were in my area, I'd treat it just >as I would any other piano. I might charge more for servicing than was >paid for the piano but that's how I make my living, piano service, not >trashing virtually every piano ever made. > >Bill Bremmer RPT >Madison, Wisconsin ><http://www.billbremmer.com/>Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . >c o m =-
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC