Kimball Whitney

David Ilvedson ilvey@sbcglobal.net
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 13:45:18 -0800


Well, I'd say accusing someone of "trashing virtually every piano made" as not so 
well expressed...if he'd had left that out, I'd have had no problem with the post...

David I.

On 5 Jan 2003 at 15:26, Richard Oliver Snelson wrote:

> 
> Tom, You are way off base here. Bill's opinion was well expressed. Too
> bad you didn't like it. Don't rant at him. Rich
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Tom Driscoll 
> To: 'Pianotech' 
> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:45 PM
> Subject: RE: Kimball Whitney
> 
> 
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]
>     On Behalf Of SidewaysWell1713@aol.com Sent: Sunday, January 05,
>     2003 2:07 PM To: pianotech@ptg.org Subject: Re: Kimball Whitney
> 
>     In a message dated 1/5/03 12:36:31 PM Central Standard Time,
>     tomtuner@attbi.com writes:
> 
> 
> 
>     List,
>      Not to open a can of worms here, and I preface my comment by
>     telling you I'm not a "digital keyboard" ,guy but even a low cost
>     digital would be more productive for a beginner than a Whitney
>     that is difficult to tune, has horrid stability problems , awful
>     tone and an action that has poor performance at best. If there is
>     a reason why Kimball is gone the Whitney may give a clue.Just my
>     opinion .
>      Tom Driscoll RPT
> 
> 
>     Funny, I never had any of these problems. Kimball is still in
>     business and making a profit. The Whitney piano will last longer
>     than all of those on here who have condemned it. If it were in my
>     area, I'd treat it just as I would any other piano. I might charge
>     more for servicing than was paid for the piano but that's how I
>     make my living, piano service, not trashing virtually every piano
>     ever made.
> 
>     Bill Bremmer RPT
>     Madison, Wisconsin
>     Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . c o m =-
>  Bill
>   Not surprising that you’d be the guy to object to my comment. For
>   accuracy sake, 
> Kimball does not make pianos any more. 
>  I service many Kimballs, some quite acceptable some less so, and do
>  my best with the 
> Whitneys in my practice. 
>  Do I trash these pianos to their owners? Of course not. The query was
>  concerning 
> opinions on the Whitney and I was responding to a reply about
> digitals. 
>  I know your skills far exceed those of mine, after all I’m a mere
>  mortal and personally 
> have trouble tuning these things and find most of them reacting wildly
> to our New England humidity swings. 
>  I reiterate--- A digital piano, always in tune with the notes all
>  working would be my choice 
> over the Whitney.
>  My ten year old is in piano lessons starting year three on a 60’s
>  Wurlitzer spinet and 
> doing well, so this is not an anti-spinet vendetta. I’ll soon get a
> studio for her as she can appreciate the touch and tone improvement
> now.
>  If I may say Bill, this is why you have so much trouble with people
>  on the list. You distort 
> a posting to exalt yourself and your skills. So go on, call be a piano
> basher and despite the obvious contributions of which you are capable
> this member finds you boorish and tiresome.
>  Tom Driscoll RPT
> 
> 



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC