Richard writes: << If we simply know some general consequences for various configurations of key leading... those can be made to conform to just about any given FW specification easily enough... or what ? >> The leads that are closer to the center of the key will move less distance and at a slower inch per second rate than leads out at the end. Since the inertial effect of mass seems to be exponentially linked to speed, keys so leaded should demonstrate less inertial resistance to heavy playing than those that is not. I have found that leading the keys inboard like this,(part of the original Steinway "Accelerated Patent) makes for a better feeling action. I think this is because of less change in inertial resistance as the force of the playing increases. And just for fun, If we accept that key bending is setting the limit on power an action is capable of, the leads in the center of the key will still be moving when the front of the key has hit the punching. (if the key is flexible enough to bend under a heavy stroke, then the portion of the key near the balance point will lag behind the outer extreme end,no?) . So, it may be that the key with the leads near the balance point will function as a mechanical capacitor, releasing energy after the end of the key, (and finger) has stopped moving. Ed Foote RPT www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/ www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC