Piano Sound: was something else

[Farrell]

You who? Not me! I was just asking about the claim.

Terry Farrell
  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Caught" <caute@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: Piano Sound: was something else


> So you says that a rim  reflects or has to reflect ?. And why should it. ?
> 
> Tony Caught
> caute@optusnet.com.au
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no>
> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:13 PM
> Subject: Piano Sound: was something else
> 
> 
> > We keep ridiculing this, without really knowing what it refers too.
> Similiar subjects come up and get discounted more or less out of hand also.
> Yet much is made of the importance of string / soundboard impedance match to
> sustain and power. Perhaps there are other "impedance matches" to the
> strings energy that play an important / significant roll in the "end
> product" sound of the piano. Perhaps its not so much a matter of whether one
> rim reflects more  or better then another... but rather that one rim
> relfects an optimal amount.. ??
> >
> > RicB
> >
> > Farrell wrote:
> >
> > > This is what I am describing on the S&S upright. And are you speaking in
> reference to the "magic circle of sound"? Does a laminated rim "reflect"
> sound better than a solid timber frame?
> > >
> > > Terry Farrell
> > >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives