work vehicles..PT Cruiser?

[Erwinspiano@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 11/26/2002 11:00:12 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
pianolover88@hotmail.com writes:


> Subj:work vehicles..PT Cruiser? 
> Date:11/26/2002 11:00:12 PM Pacific Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:pianolover88@hotmail.com">pianolover88@hotmail.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
>          Hi Terry
>            I (my wife) owns a 2001 Pt cruiser. We don't actually use it for 
> business but you certainly could. It's a very fun car ,rides  and handles 
> well good on long trips. I have 25k miles on it and not a stich of 
> problems. There are however some detractors. It needs aggressive tire 
> patterns to be secure in heavy rain or snow. We don't have snow but the 
> it's really squirrly in the rain with the tire that come on it. I'll be 
> changing those soon. The oter is it has the worst turnogn radius of any car 
> I've ever driven .My Expedition is twice as good. And lastly the mileage is 
> a dis appointing 18 -20 around town and we've not gotten more than 23.5 on 
> road trips. Other than that ti's a kick in the pants ,plenty of power. It's 
> not for everybody.
>    Hope that helps
>      Dale Erwin

> 
> Any list members own a Chrysler "PT Cruiser"? Been pricing them and 
> checkin' 
> 'em out; pretty cool little wagons seem perfect for a tech. Plently of room 
> 
> for at least two actions in the back and lots of other stuff. Looking at  a 
> 
> 2001 LTD  with only  3,500 miles. seller asking 18k which is 2+ UNDER blue 
> book. Was hoping to get feedback from PT owners. thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> Terry Peterson
> 
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/03/2e/70/cd/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--