Of Miracles and Duplex's (was Re: S&S D Duplex)

[Richard Brekne]

Chalk it up to differences in Mail Readers Del. On my Netscape 4.7 this all
comes out perfectly clear with appropriate amount of arrows denoting who wrote
what when. But I do undestand the sentiment... happens to me all the time. Sorry
for any confusion tho... but I do try my very best to keep posts clear of
unnecessary baggage, while at the same time containing enough reference to whats
been said to be clear.


Delwin D Fandrich wrote:

> -Uh, Richard, I did not write all that you attribute to my pen (OK,
> keyboard). If nothing else I try to be more careful about spelling and
> spacing. Nor do I bite that way.
>
> Del
>
> > Delwin D Fandrich wrote:
> >
> > > > Ok... as long as nobody else is bitting :)
> > > >
> > > > If the duples is such a fantastic (as in unbelievable) idea, why is is
> > > > so easy to buy into the idea that slightly out of tune unisons give
> > > > longer sustain then clean or far out of tune unisons ?Its all about
> ever
> > > > so slightly assynchrohnous vibratory reonforcement :)
> > > >
> > > > RicB
> > >
> > > Not all of us do. It may just seem longer....
> > >
> > > Del
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Richard Brekne
> > RPT, N.P.T.F.
> > UiB, Bergen, Norway
> > mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
> > http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives




--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
UiB, Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html