action ratios

[Richard Brekne]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Dale,

What a nicely written post ! And I agree 100 % and more.

Erwinspiano@aol.com wrote:

> .....
>    I  think that this whole idea of "Component Action
> Balancing" Terry F.'s term, is a fabulous tool No modern
> technician would be without but there are differing levels
> which it can be applied and my point is to "Point that
> out" to prevent less indoctrinated or experienced brethren
> on the list to be overwhelmed by the whole discussion of
> action balancing and simply throw up there hands saying
> I'll never be able to sell my clients all that so why try.
>
>    As Bill Spurlock has often said "many people were moved
> to tears, goose bumps, etc., by many of these pianos" when
> they were new, which doesn't mean they were as refined as
> we know they can be now  but it's important to strive to
> do consistent basic piano work first and add the more
> technical type skills as fast as one can. In concluding
> Bill has also often said"It isn't necessary to reinvent
> every action for every client" even though I'd personally
> like to. Does that make sense to any body else.
>    Just my view >Dale Erwin




--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
UiB, Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/1a/ba/19/48/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--