--- Richard Brekne <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> wrote: > Not sure I am with you here..... are you saying that > tuning down pitch > causes strings to need seating ?... No, it came up 8 cents then down 8 cents. My thinking is when it was pitch raised I think the board moved down a bit, the strings may not follow. This is conjecture on my part, looking for others input. > Hey.... as long as you are getting paid for all the > work involved... why > should anyone refuse a legitimate job ? So why refuse. Because I am searching for a higher standard then I find I can produce 8 cents up, 8 cents down, 8 cents up..... I don't mean refuse the Job, but refuse to change pitch that much. This is used for TV broadcast sometimes. There is no way the piano is going to be as stable. I want it to sound its best more then I want more work. I have too much work anyway, it is a problem. This piano was done 16 times last month. Before I pitch raised it it was stable as a rock. I had refined my tuning, experimented with the stretch. I had never used tunelab before, but used the fact I as doing this piano so often to experiment with the program by analyizing the way I tune aurally, negotiated with tunelab, Measured the inharmicity of every bass note(for interest),I ended up memorizing/saving my best aural tuning on it with the program. It was sounding very, very good, Strings seated and level, voiced, and very getting extreamly stable. Now it appears to have taken two steps back. A high standard is far more important then making more work, and having a weaker product for it. Thanks Dave Renaud RPT Dave Renaud > > RPT > > Canada > > > > -- > Richard Brekne > RPT, N.P.T.F. > Bergen, Norway > mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no > http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html > > ______________________________________________________________________ Games, Movies, Music & Sports! http://entertainment.yahoo.ca
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC