---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 5/2/2002 8:21:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, grandrestorations@yahoo.com writes: > Subj:Re: Pinblocks > Date:5/2/2002 8:21:27 PM Pacific Standard Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:grandrestorations@yahoo.com">grandrestorations@yahoo.com</A> > Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > > Brian Dittos Maple blocks. Expensive but for me it's the way to go. Bolduc. I've not used the cheap stuff though many manufacturers hace. I've heard of a few that had torque failures after a short time. Bill Spurlock for one. Best>>>>Dale>>>>>>>>>. > > Hi David, > > Ok, I'll stick my neck out. (We'll see if I'm > handed it back detached or not...) > > I've used Bolduc pinblocks. They are wonderful. > They are also expensive. > > If a piano isn't particularly special, for > whatever reason, I don't have a problem with > using a multilaminate block. I've used them on > quite a number of pianos and have not had any > significant problems. I drill them much the same > way (same size drill bits) as I would a Bolduc > block. > > I have used the standard multilaminate blocks > from Schaff and Apsco. I haven't used the > Delignit type blocks. > > If budget is an issue, I don't have a problem > making this substitution on something like you > describe. But I'd hate to do it on a Mason & > Hamlin or a Steinway or something of similar > caliber. > > Others might have differing opinions. > > FWIW... > > Brian T. > ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c5/36/c5/67/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC