bridle strap - was Re: 1902 Conover upright jack lever

kam544@flash.net kam544@flash.net
Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:50:34 -0500


>...I would think the strap would have to be adjusted somewhat tauter then
>we do
>today... or what.. ?
>Richard Brekne

More good stuff there, Richard.

About the tauter thing:

Just yesterday I went out on a service call for a note that was reported
inoperative (studio size piano).  The problem was the inability of a hammer
to return due to a broken hammer butt spring, so it just rested itself
against its related music wire.

My first thought, of course, was, "Well, looks like I am going to have to
replace that butt spring."  No real big deal, really.  But then I noticed
all this excess play in the bridle strap.  So for the fun of it and an
obvious short cut, I modified (bent) the bridle wire back sufficiently to
cause the strap to be "tauter", which then allowed the hammer to start its
return back home when the key was released.

Now, as a result of this thread, I'm thinking in the case of upright pianos
in general, that another serious consideration for the bridle tape concept
was to insure that the hammer actually returned far enough back past the
point of perpendicular to its mounting, coupled with overcoming any center
pin resistance, to enable the hammer return spring to then do its job of
returning the hammer to its final destination.

Final destination meaning, close enough so the jack lever tip will at least
be able to engage the hammer to strike again.  Ironically, that would then
touch on the premise of aiding faster repetition, or more exactly as I see
it, allowing the note, for all practical purposes, to be repeated at all.

What fun!

Keith McGavern
Registered Piano Technician
Oklahoma Chapter 731
Piano Technicians Guild
USA




This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC