Hi Jeanne. Interesting responses so far. One was that it may be OK to only install the dehumidifier with humidistat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeannie Grassi" <jgrassi@silverlink.net> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:36 PM Subject: FWD: Is complete 5-Part Dampp-chaser unit always necessary? > Dear List, > This came to me for your consideration from Ryan Sowers, RPT: > > >>As technicians we try to educate our clients so that they can take the > best > care of their pianos. I have attended several classes on humidity control at > conventions and talked with experienced technicians whose opinions I > respect. Combined with my a bit of personal experience with these systems I > have become convinced that they are of substantial enough benefit that we > are doing our clients a disservice if we are not actively promoting these > products. However there is an aspect of humidity control that I do not > understand. Is the humidifier component beneficial in environments where > the relative humidity never drops below 42%? Since the humidifier is the > most expensive portion of the system and also the only part that requires > routine maintenance it is tempting to recommend installing the dehumidifier > and the humidistat only. I called dampp-chaser and asked them if they had > studied the effectiveness this and they said no and that the only system > they recommend is the complete system. Here in the Pacific Northwest the > indoor humidity practically never goes below 42 % except in cases where the > client has wood heat. I believe in the value of humidity control, but am I > wasting my client's money recommending the 5 part system when a simple 2 > part system might be as effective? > > Sincerely, > Ryan Sowers RPT > Puget Sound Chapter<< > > > > Jeannie Grassi, RPT > Associate Editor, Piano Technicians Journal > mailto:jgrassi@silverlink.net >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC