Rolled bridge: cause? diagnosis? treatment? Or maybe a floating pinblock?

Farrell mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:19:43 -0400


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
I'm sure Ron N. and Del with have some excellent advice for you, but =
here are a couple preliminary things to consider.

You say that the rear top edge of the bridge averages 1/8" taller than =
the front. Has the bridge come loose from the board? If the soundboard =
plane (well, it's close to planar) and the string plane were roughly =
parallel to begin with, the two bridge top edges should be pretty close =
to the same height - whether the bridge is rolled or not. This sounds to =
me like whoever planed the bridge cap down was leaning a bit to the left =
(if they were standing on the curved side of the piano!), i.e. a =
construction error.

Front and rear downbearing are best measured with a component =
downbearing gauge. Keep in mind though, that if the bridge cap was not =
properly planed during construction, bad component downbearing may not =
mean a rolled bridge.

I have found that examination of the soundboard is also a good way to =
characterize a rolled bridge. Do the taut string test on the bottom side =
of the piano. You really need to be precise with this. Stretch that =
string and carefully and look for soundboard crown. But look also for =
inverse crown. You need to be pulling the string up and down repeatedly =
to observe when and where the string is contacting the board. Have good =
light casting a good shadow. Check many places. If the bridge was =
originally constructed well and now it is rolled, presumably the =
soundboard has also deformed. If the bridge has rolled forward, on the =
front side of the bridge you will have a soundboard with either inverted =
crown, a flat board, or less crown that the rear - and on the rear side =
the board should have some nice crown, or at least more so than the =
front.

Terry Farrell =20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Thomas Sheehan=20
  To: Pianotech=20
  Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:30 AM
  Subject: Rolled bridge: cause? diagnosis? treatment? Or maybe a =
floating pinblock?


  Dear colleagues -=20

  The piano is a 1972 S&S Hamburg B. It was restrung about 5 years ago, =
and had the pinblock replaced (Falconwood, unfortunately), and also had =
new hammers (S&S - Hamburg), shanks & flanges installed. The company =
that did the work is an experienced rebuilding outfit.

  The piano came back "dead". Very limited sustain - less than 5 seconds =
in octaves 6 and 7 (many notes). Extremely dead rear duplex - less than =
2 seconds in top two sections. Weak upper partial volume and sustain =
throughout. Bass is tubby. False beats throughout; weird out-of-tune =
partials in the bass. All these tonal phenomena occur whether the string =
is struck by a hammer, or is plucked.

  After racking my brains about this piano (I service it about 2x per =
year), I finally had the idea to measure the height of the bridge cap =
above the soundboard, on both the speaking length side, and on the rear =
duplex side. The rear duplex side is anywhere from 2/32" to 6/32" inch =
_higher_ than the speaking length side.=20

  The piano is extremely unstable. It is impossible to get absolutely =
beatless unisons for more than 2 - 5 mf to ff hammer strokes. The =
beating that does creep in is very slight, but noticeable to my nearly =
28 years of tuning experience ears (credited tuner by name on many =
Grammy Award-winning recordings, as well as concert piano factory =
trained by Yamaha, Steinway & Baldwin; occasional tuner at Carnegie Hall =
and Lincoln Center).=20

  Although I really dislike Falconwood blocks, this one is measuring an =
average of 140 inch/lbs. Not too tight. 2/0 pins with about 3/8" =
clearance between the bottom of the coil and the plate. I have squeezed =
the wire gently around the hitch pins so that the strings are parallel =
to each other. I have also used CLP at the capo, agraffe, understring =
felt, and the apex of the rear duplex, and at the raised projection that =
terminates the upper duplex in the top two sections.=20

  No or maybe a little improvement in stability.=20

  All plate perimeter screws are tight, as are webbing screws.

  Does this sound like a rolled bridge? How is a rolled bridge caused? =
Is there an accurate way to diagnose a rolled bridge? Can it be fixed in =
the field?=20

  Thank you very much in advance for your comments and advice!

  See you in Reno!?!?!?!?!?!!!!!

  Sincerely,

  Tom Sheehan, RPT
  NYC Chapter

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/e1/76/72/cb/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC