> On an other note; when a piano is that flat (-140c), the first time > through I will just pull it up to pitch, or maybe a little sharp, and see > what happens when I tune the unisons. I count on two pitch raises. Otherwise > you're pulling individual strings fourty cents sharp for a differential of > 180 cents between the tuned and un-tuned notes. Scares me! > I'm sure that you do things pretty much the same way, let me know. I just > said that more for the newbies who may be lurking. Oh, yeah! I got it up to pitch in 2-1/2 passes. On bigger pitch raises, I'll go through the hi-treble an extra time so that each raise is smaller - just less chance of breaking strings. Pulled bass, tenor, and treble 10 cents sharp, and hi-treble just up to pitch on first pass. Went through hi-treble again, pulling it 10 cents sharp. Then I went through the whole scale again doing a regular pitch raise with the SAT pitch-raising feature. Before starting the last pass, I found the bass was about 30 cents flat, tenor about 50 cents flat, treble about 60 cents flat, and hi-treble about 30 cents flat. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin E. Ramsey" <ramsey@extremezone.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:50 PM Subject: Re: SAT/Inharmonicity Observation > Terry, you remember the discussion we had a week or so ago about the low > tension in the lower tenor on the Yamaha GH1? One of the members came back > with figures that supported my theory of the tenor section tension being > dropped too low, and the inharmonicity factor was about double what it was > in the top note of the bass section. > Therefore, you could safely assume that the inharmonicity would obviously > change with that great a change in the overall tension of the string. > On an other note; when a piano is that flat (-140c), the first time > through I will just pull it up to pitch, or maybe a little sharp, and see > what happens when I tune the unisons. I count on two pitch raises. Otherwise > you're pulling individual strings fourty cents sharp for a differential of > 180 cents between the tuned and un-tuned notes. Scares me! > I'm sure that you do things pretty much the same way, let me know. I just > said that more for the newbies who may be lurking. > > > > Kevin E. Ramsey > ramsey@extremezone.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 7:32 PM > Subject: SAT/Inharmonicity Observation > > > > I serviced a 1940 Chickering Studio today. Hadn't been tuned in decades - > > very good condition. It was 140 cents flat. I did an FAC calculation with > > the strings 140 cents flat. FAC values were 10.5, 11.2, and 8.5. Raised > the > > pitch up to A440. Figured maybe I should double check - maybe > inharmonicity > > would change. FAC values @ A440 were 8.7, 9.7, and 7.0. All decreased by > > about 1.5. I would imagine this simply follows some sort of theory, which > > obviously I have no knowledge of. Just thought some might be interested. > > :-) > > > > Terry Farrell > > > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC