On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 08:33:25 JIMRPT wrote: > >Phil; > A few comments here if ya don mind......... ><< "It would be so light and flexible that it couldn't >absorb any energy.">> > Kinda the wrong slant here vis a vis soundboards??................A light >and flexible rim may not "absorb any energy" but it certainly will >'dissipate' energy and be unable to reflect any, or at least very little, >energy back to the board. > >Jim Bryant (FL) > Jim, Part of the point of this suggestion was to get some feedback on why it's necessary to 'reflect' energy back into the soundboard. When a 'wave' gets to the edge of the board, if there is no obstruction (such as a rim) what's the wave going to do, jump off into the air? I don't know much about wave propogation but I don't think it works that way. Something else will happen and the board will vibrate in a different way. I don't know specifically how it would vibrate differently and I don't know if this would be better than the way things work now but it might be worth a thought. Why do you think having a very flexible support would 'dissipate' energy? For energy to be transferred what the energy is transferring into has to be capable of absorbing it. If you push on a noodle very little work is done to move it and very little of the energy from you finger is going to 'dissipate' in the noodle. Phil F -- Click here for your very own create-a-date adventure from MatchMaker Go to http://ecard.matchmaker.com/dating.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC