Phil, Ron, JD and all, > >Ron, > >Thanks. I actually saw your response to JD's post. . . But since >we're on the subject, > >I believe you mentioned . . . that you use a modified . . >Conklin formula and then you proceeded to give the Conklin formula. >In what way do you modify it, or is > >that proprietary? >> >>Phil > >I diced a kinetic energy formula into Conklin's formula to see what it >would do, and ended up liking it a little better. It's no big secret, but >it doesn't particularly mean anything either so I haven't made it available >to avoid being asked, or ordered, to defend it. There's nothing like a little undisciplined criticism to curb the free flow of information. Can't say I blame you a bit Ron N. Been one or two prickly vapours wafting through the ether recently. Maybe we should collectively lighten up a bit, or a lot of worthwhile contribution might dry up. >Neither formula means >anything exact, but is just a relative indication so you can see where you >are in relation to the rest of the scale. Much like most aspects of scaling. > >Ron N -- ______________________________ Website: http://www.overspianos.com.au Email: mailto:ron@overspianos.com.au ______________________________
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC