John writes:
<<I must
devote the necessary time to learning various temperaments. I have
Jorgensen's book, so it is doable whenever I can find the time. I have only
a SAT II, so any HTs will be done aurally, which is fine by me anyway.>>
Greetings,
This brings up a worthwhile point. Time vs. Money, or, "How am I supposed
to learn all these different temperaments?" You don't HAVE to devote a lot
of time to hear the various temperaments.
Jorgensen's 'Tuning" coupled with the progammable tuning machine has
dramatically lowered the cost of temperament exploration. A working tech can
now easily produce the tunings found in the piano's historical record without
the huge investment of time previously required.
Whereas Barbour's work is all that is really needed to tune in the
applicable styles, the time required to master a working repertoire of
temperaments has, for over 50 years, been too high for the vast majority of
techs to justify. Especially for what has been an extremely limited market.
(We do tune for money,no?)
The ability to create well temperaments electronically has, in the last
5 years, resulted in a huge increase in the number of tuners tuning non-ET in
various venues. There are techs that are tuning these aurally, but from
informal surveys of my classes, they appear to represent about 20 % of the
techs involved.
I tried the aural instructions from "Tuning" before finding out what
those numbers at the back of the chapters meant. Once I used the correction
figures Owen gives, I found that I was producing tunings that sounded just
like my aural efforts, the differences being so slight that they required
careful measurement to actually find. From a musical standpoint, the
differences were moot.
So, how to use a SATII? Simply use an existing tuning for a given
piano and use the pitch change calculator for the note's alteration. If the
C's need to be sharpened from ET by 6 cents, just put that +6 in (via the
calculator) and tune all the C's, zero that offset, and put in the next
offset and tune all of those notes. It is a little less laborious than
tuning chromatically and changing up or down for each note, though that is
another approach.
Using a machine on a smaller piano requires the same compensation that an
ET would, so I would suggest using a custom program instead of the FAC as a
base for the offsets to work with.
It is also worth noting that tuning aurally tunes the tuner as well as
the piano, so I would encourage anybody that is interested in non-ET tunings
to work through a few of them aurally first, it does educate and sensitize
the ear of the tuner. ( I don't suppose that is so different than our
widely-ascribed-to belief that even an ET tuner should be able to tune by ear
before wielding the machine).
Regards,
Ed Foote RPT.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC