Associate to associate

[Richard Brekne]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Nice well balanced response Jolly... I like your style.

jolly roger wrote:

>                Maybe some of us don't feel the need. I pay $180 US
> to do some think that will do nothing for my income, or status, as
> far as I am concerned.

> I would beg to differ on these points, I have fixed more than my
> fair share of RPT Faux pas. that has caused the consumer a lot of
> grief and money.  As a dealer, I have also parted company with
> more than a few, so say qualified techs, that had less than
> adaquate technical skills, and border line ethics.
>
> And you are not prejaciced???  There many associate technicians on
> this list that I would be calling to work on my piano, before
> searching for a RPT.
>
> Having said that.  The exam process is a good thing, and should be
> encouraged for those who want a yard stick to measure their
> skills, but unfortunately many seem to quit the learning, and
> attending conventions. Thinking they are a fully trained craftsman
> after passing the exam.
>
> As PTG members we should be thinking far more inclusively, and
> less RPT exclusive.  It would be healthier for all.
> PTG for me is about fellowship and education, and I like like to
> think that I give and take on both of these counts.
>
> Regards Roger.
>

--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
Bergen, Norway
mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/38/0b/92/f5/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--