Negative implications should be ignored when surrounded by garbage. Richard Oliver Snelson Richard Brekne wrote: > > I dont think its wise to simply discount the negative implications of an issue > simply because there are some very visable positives. What may seem to outweigh > the other today may not seem so apparent tommorrow. > > jolly roger wrote: > > > >> I'm sick and tired of mollycoddling associates and non-members who want it > > >> GIVEN to them, with no initiative of their own! Get with the program or go > > >> somewhere else to be a general pain in the ass to all! > > >> Joe Garrett > > Joe, > > Respectfully you are out of line with this comment, I'm an > > associate by choice, and can't be accused of taking and not giving a lot > > in return. > > Associates of all types have a lot to give, even when they are newbies, > > they have their enthusiasm to offer. Or pushing mentors to rethink what and > > why they do various tasks. This is of value, and is healthy. > > The quality of the Journal would dramatically drop with out their dues. So > > think of their valuable financial support. > > You do the PTG a disservice by putting down any one that is associated > > with the organization. > > There are a fair number of associates on this list that give a lot of > > their time helping RPT's sort out their screw ups. > > > > Sorry for the rant, but enough is enough. > > > > Regards Roger > > -- > Richard Brekne > RPT, N.P.T.F. > Bergen, Norway > mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC