Bill Ballard wrote: > > > It's not at odds with previous knowledge and nostrums. It just > happens to be in a parallel dimension, the dimension of mass instead > of distance. Sorry about that... typo ... should have read "Stanwoods method is not (cant possibly be) at odds... ...etc.. figured most of you woulda picked up on that as the "(cant possibly be)" was there.. Thanks for the fine posting Bill -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC