The Journal article you're looking for is in the January 1999 issue(Page 31) . There is also a small article in Industry News of the July 1999 issue (Page 37). David ilvedson wrote: > I believe the Wapin bridge was explained in the Journal some > time ago? I thought I saw pictures of it. From cloudy memory > one bridge pin was straight up and the other two tilted as > usual. I'm sure I am not close to right on this but what the > hell. I don't feel like looking it up. > > David I. > > Date sent: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:40:19 +0100 > From: Richard Brekne <richardb@c2i.net> > To: pianotech@ptg.org > Subject: Re: Wapin Bridge > Send reply to: pianotech@ptg.org > > > Exactly my point... in the end everything Wapin is trying to protect for its own > > profit will come out.. and if its really worthwhile... there will be the > > inevitable copies, variations etc etc ad absurdum. Better to compete on the > > level of quality, workmanship, support and all these positives. That road can be > > started on right away by loosening up on enough detail so that interested techs > > (and there are many) are not scared away by this particular combination of > > expense and prior secrecy. Say what you like... my opinion is Wapin does > > themselves no favour by not offering a reasonalby complete technical > > explaination. > > > > Be that as it may.. the patent office is open for viewing and I personally am > > going to download a copy of whatever I find on Wapin and figure it out on my > > own. > > > > ANRPiano@AOL.COM wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 2/14/00 7:13:05 PM Central Standard Time, > > > bake@spa.att.ne.jp writes: > > > > > > << It is very expensive to apply for, > > > aquire, and maintain a patent and that cost is reflected in the cost of an > > > installation license fee ($325 BTW). >> > > > > > > Yes, but, I would be willing to install the Wapin in all the pianos I > > > rebuild, but not at $325 per installation. IMHO I would think it would be > > > advantageous to the Wapin folks if their technology became the standard for > > > all pianos instead of rarely used. Look no further than the PC and the MAC. > > > It is simple economics instead of receiving a couple thousand from my shop > > > each year for two dozen installations they will receive $0. > > > > > > But that is their concern, not mine. > > > > > > Andrew Remillard > > > > -- > > Richard Brekne > > Associate PTG, N.P.T.F. > > Bergen, Norway > > > > > > > > > > David Ilvedson, RPT > Pacifica, CA > ilvey@jps.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC