Bill Ballard wrote: > List, > > I have a piano teacher with a legitimate complaint about repetition on a > 20 year-old Baldwin Studio Upright 243. The jack won't make it back > under the butt until the key returns, and sometimes not even them. The > butt and catcher leathers are also a synthetic which i would describe as > 220 grit. > > My test for repetition is to use a finger of the LH as an up-stop, and > to find at what point lowering that stop will prevent to jack's return > > The problem clears up when I lift the hammer rail for ~1mm lost motion > at the keyboard, but I'm uncomfortable leaving in a lost motion of this > size. > > I did remove the spring rail and bend all springs to that the butt had a > minimum of return from the string (a bend going from 3pm to 5pm, as > viewed from the bass). The repetition didn't appear to have gained, and > now, the action is too slow in very quiet playing. So regardless of what > positive effect weakening the hammer springs in relation to the jack > spring might have, I'll have to backtrack from this to get a more > positive return in quiet playing. > > I also changed one hammer butt for a brand new Baldwin butt with > beautiful smooth buckskin, but once again it wasn't clear the the > dramatic step down in friction with real butt leather helped out the > jack's return. Starting over with a complete set of new butts is an option > > Any ideas on improving repetition in this piano? > > > Bill Ballard, RPT > NH Chapter PTG > > "Can you check out this middle C?. It "whangs' - (or twangs?) > Thanks so much, Ginger" > ...........Service Request > +++++++++++++++++++++ Bill, Just curious; do the whipens seem to be free? I ran across a dinosaur 243 that clearly had the hammers returning before the whipens could drop. I wanted to repin the whipen flanges, but the dollars weren't there. Protek helped a lot. Also, it seemed that the introduction of a little back weight might have been in order. Joseph Alkana
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC