The tuner controversy

[Robert Moffatt]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment


Subject: Re: The tuner controversy


> In a message dated 12/15/00 8:15:28 PM Central Standard Time,=20
> Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no writes:
>  The arguement centers around the idea  that a good tuning implicitly =
means
>  there was a knowledgeable, skilled technician preforming the work.
>  The only human skill and knowledge needed to execute that tuning is =
that of
>  setting the pins to the machines satisfaction.
 =20

True, aurally, or machine. (I prefer aural) In my experience, the only =
true test,
is after the "fat lady sings". Or, Rach 1,2,3,4...etc. After the said =
human has "set
the pins" in the first few bars, your skill will be determined by the =
performer, and
remembered by all involved.  Yet, there are variables.......the =
"tuner",could have=20
a horse shoe up his butt....or the pianist is sitting on his/her ears!

In my humble opinion.

Bob Moffatt
Calgary, Alberta
really ccccold
Canada


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/4a/69/fe/ed/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--