>Most scientists agree that, while there will be an initial growth spurt in >many trees and plants, this growth subsequently flattens and their food and >nutrition value plummets. As carbon dioxide stresses plant metabolisms, >they become more prone to disease, insect attacks and fires. > >Del Last winter was very mild here, and I was fully expecting to be eaten alive by all the bugs that had such a cozy winter nap instead of being frozen and killed down to the usual number. Meanwhile, from about mid January on, half the people I talked to complained that this was the worst year for allergies, sinus problems and general upper respiratory disfunction that they had ever had. Come spring, and through the entire month of June, the front porch light produced virtually nothing in the way of bugs. No moths, no may flies, no June bugs - nothing. A rural family, tuning customers, who make a yearly game of harvesting me a bucket of toads for my yard ( toads are among my favorite things ) reported that there weren't any toads this spring. Meanwhile, my customers are still mentioning what a miserable year this has been for breathing. For my little part of the world, global warming may very well come too late to do us any damage. What ever is up wind of us will have killed us all before then with the EPA allowable, or concealable, mix and concentration of atmospheric discharge that apparently doesn't officially exist. We probably never will know what it was, or is. That's the problem with living in an unnaturally luxurious style. It violates a few basic laws of conservation, among which - to make something clean, something else has to get dirty. Sure, everyone could cut back and find alternative energy sources, and sure, the problems almost certainly aren't as they're being represented to be by the groups that stand to gain short term profit by the public adoption of their viewpoints and programs. They're probably much worse. When in our lives have we ever made it through a day without being lied to by at least one of the sundry factions that ultimately collectively determine whether we live or die, and in what style? How many times has some invisible and unreachable someone or something presumed to do our thinking for us in spite of their total lack of qualification for the job? Of the number of times we find out about it accidentally, how many more hundreds of times does it happen without our knowledge or sanction? How could we possibly gather enough reliably factual information to make intelligent decisions when we have virtually no means of gathering such information? Every "fact" we have access to has been generated by request or decree, under the funding of various factions wishing to filter any and all information through their own multi level bias before deciding how to present it for public scrutiny through the most politically expedient channel. Some of us can see for ourselves what sort of carnage results from these wheels within wheels and layers upon layers of self serving games, but the cold fact most likely is that any implemented reforms will be simply a localized diversion of cash and power resulting from a deftly played political maneuver more successfully disguised as something intended for the public good than the previous scam. We won't even be aware of where the real game is being played, much less being allowed to sit in on a hand, and will be only vaguely able to follow the results and keep score by the accumulated damage. We're just the equipment, not the players. Would that it weren't so, but altruism on a governmental scale simply doesn't exist. As long as here's a buck to be made, there will be plenty of takers ripping each other to shreds to make it at any cost to the rest of the world. As a species, we aren't even respectable parasites. A successful parasite doesn't kill the host, and from what we see around the world, that's what is happening. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC