Which ETD?

[John Ross]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi,
I think we all like the system we started with.
I started with Dr. Al's rotating lights, and I got used to them.
I have progressed from the S.O.T., to the SAT, through the
different upgrades. I now have a SAT lll.
I like it because it is user friendly, compact, battery life is great =
and
no one would think of stealing it, if left unattended. I really like the =
automatic
note advance feature. It is compact enough to place anywhere on the =
piano.
It is also a great learning tool, if you want to test your own tunings =
against
an FAC one. It will compare and give you the results.
The FAC gave me an 95%+ on the tuning exam with ETD.
The only downside, with all ETD's is, that you should learn aurally =
first,
because if you don't, you may never. Just ask me, I keep on meaning
to pass the aural part of the exam, but I just never get around to =
practising
enough.
Regards,
John M. Ross
Windsor, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Doug Garman=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 10:44 PM
  Subject: Which ETD?


  OK folks.  I'm considering purchasing my first ETD.  Simple question =
-- which one should I get and why?  I'll stand way back from the screen =
and wait for your responses.  :o)

  Doug Garman, Associate
  Ft. Worth Chapter

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/be/5f/3b/00/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--