Cybertuner vs. SAT III

[PDtek@AOL.COM]

In a message dated 98-11-10 00:39:10 EST, you write:

> Hi Richard,
>                  If compactness and battery charge time is important then
>  the SAT will win.
>  Advantages of RCT .Pianalyser is a very dynamic tool for voicing and
>  analysing scales, I have found it invaluable in teaching voicing and
>  regulation classes.
>   The ability to upgrade the system at minimal cost as developments improve
>  the systems.
>    As a basic 'toonin' device I think both systems are comparable.
>  Easy to get at files and records.
>  Talk to Dean I'm sure he will give you a run down on future developments.
>  Regards Roger
>  

If a sub-size laptop is used, compactness is no longer a factor.

One of the biggest differences is the pitch raise program. As I understand,
the SAT uses a flat 25% overpull calculation, which is too much in the bass
and not enough in the treble. The RCT uses the optimum amount of overpull for
each note from 12% to 38%. It also calculates into the equation the pitches of
the last 5 notes. The results are very accurate.

Both machines in skilled hands will keep your customers happy. The RCT removes
alot of "sweat" from the process.

Dave Bunch