Dear Josep and List, I read one response to this thread about the cellular composition of wood becoming more "resonant" with age due to the loss of the "plasms' in the cells of the wood thereby making it more responsive to vibration. True but, this loss also indicates that the cell structure is breaking down. Some panels of this vintage S.B. wood may indeed have reached that point where the wood is just at the right point of looseness or responsive......but..... What happens to that same wood when you once again add the stress of crown and downbearing pressure for another 20 or so odd years?? It is perhaps a matter of practical engineering that new wood which can often be of higher quality than the original soundboard material be used instead of rebuilding dead wood. Why risk the possible structural failure of the soundboard and components when one could greatly increase the chance at giving the customer back an instrument that could go for 20+ years or more before needing another rebuild?? All soundboards come into their own optimum resonance with some peaking at a much faster rate than others it seems. The old analogy of "The Stradivarius" was once again used......thus comparing apples to oranges again. I don't understand why techs will do this from time to time. I've never heard of a vintage "Strad" being rebuilt with a new top have you?? Is there a burial ground for those things once they're dead or do they all wind up at the Smithsonean. (I know little about "Strads") Sincerely, Dale Whitehead, RPT Franklin Piano Restorations TN
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC