Greetings, (seems like James and I are the only ones out this morning, for a chat.....(:)}}) Also I'll say that Wim Blees gave a really good, one-man seminar to the Nashville PTG yesterday, delivering a good shot of fresh business and techical perspective to the techs here. Ok, So James writes: <<I submit that people who are tuning an HT have the same problem. Your intentions are to make it a "perfect HT" and yet with being human it comes out to be that persons version of HT. Right-Wrong?>> Wrong on one count, and debatable, (that's why we are here) on another. First, "people who are tuning an HT have the same problem". James, you are lumping all proponents of HT together, and there are HT advocates out there I don't want to be associated with. That said, I can only speak for myself, and be willing to be judged on what I do. There is no perfect anything, at least, not here on this planet. But, perfection in any sense, of temperament will by necessity deal with smaller increments than exist between two different tuning systems. Attacking any temperament practise for its inabitiy to be "perfect" is dodging the question of the validity of that practise. All temperaments are era specific. We can plot the demise of the "Grand American Piano Industry" as an event that began after the practise of modern ET was established. Did ET contribute to the population's loss of interest? Has the music composed between 1900 and now finally begun to bring people back to the piano, what with ET haveing a century to influence? Did we almost lose the instrument because the use of modern tuning on 17th, 18th, and 19th century music was subliminally disgusting? Or was it a depression, war, and the need to build a country? I don't know, but I sure wish some young PHd candidate somewhere would undertake the study. Regards, Ed Foote (Hey! Maybe ET caused those wars, Plato was talking about tuning doing this sort of thing many centuries ago.........
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC