To Les's observations below, I would like to add the importance of the hammer shank. I recently tuned a Wurlitzer grand (circa 1988) with hammer shanks in the treble section that were not round but oblong, or "skinny" in diameter in horizontal plane. Perhaps words fail this description, but these "narrow" shanks must have been intended for tonal enhancement. Was it to reduce mass or increase flexibility? I have also seen these shanks in earlier pianos., Of course when replacing shanks in uprights we have the option of which way the grain faces. One way gives better strength, but the other way gives less stress to the flange centers,(theoretically) This is after we have culled of course. So which way is better and why? Does it really relate to how the bat is held in baseball? And regarding upright shanks, in the old days there were maple and cedar.(and probably birch) Suppose I want cedar for the treble, can I still get them? And could I get "narrow shanks" for grand replacements? Richard Achipofftheoldlog Moody ---------- > From: Les Smith <lessmith@buffnet.net> > To: pianotech@byu.edu > Subject: Re: Bechstein-restauration > Date: Friday, March 21, 1997 5:45 PM > snip > So the wieght of a particular hammer depends upon BOTH the type of > wood used for the molding and the density of its felt. snip > Les Smith > lessmith@buffnet.net >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC