Ed Wrote: > You may want to measure the bearing at several places under the tape, >before you move it up or down several ribs. Doing it this way can give you >an idea of the board's overall shape. > > Amount? Seems like all pianos have their own optimum about of bearing >pressure. It must be enough to tighten the whole structure, but not so much >that the sound board has been forced to it's elastic limit. > > I would be interested in how much downbearing others find appropriate >for old soundboards; who does what? > >Regards, >Ed Foote I just HAVE to be a little nit-picker here, and point out the distinction between bearing and crown... Crown is the curvature of the board. Which can be measured quite well using the method Ed describes. (never thought of using tape leader - you must do a lot of studio work Ed) Bearing is the amount of string load on the bridges, measured as the degree of string deflection over the bridge. These two measurements are independant of each other. A piano can have lots of crown and no bearing, or lots of bearing and no crown, or lots of crown and back bearing - but no front bearing. etc... As to the point of the initial post. I agree with the idea that its the tone of the music that tells you if the set-up is OK. An extreme example is a Steinway B I came across a while ago that had serious negative bearing (the strings were riding so high on the bridge pins that they could not be seated) and a flat board - but it sounded GREAT! - not that I'm going to set up my next rebuild that way or anything - but I'm not going to mess with this one either. Just getting back at Ed for correcting me on my non-traditional needling post ; ) John McKone, RPT St. louis Park, Minnesota (612) 280-8375 mckonejw@skypoint.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC