Greetings all, Bill Bailer writes; >>I have a few specific questions in reference to extracted lines from of >>your message, as follows: (Ed said;) " The increased inharmonicity of our modern pianos should be taken into >account when deciding on temperaments. What was tolerably smooth on a >harpsichord is usually harsher on the modern piano. " (Bill), >>Since a modern piano tone contains a lower percentage of higher >>partials, it seems to me that it should be MORE tolerant of extreme >>temperament than a harpsichord. I think you are right, at least theoretically, and in some practical situations. I was speaking of customer's reactions in the comparisons, and it is often the case that a Werckmiester or equal beating Stanhope,(Jorgenson's nomenclature is used here), will please a customer mightily on the harpsichord, but when applied to a small grand, sounds horrible. While more overtone laden than the pianoforte, the harsichord's highly tempered keys don't seem to be as objectionable to modern ears as the piano. I would have been on stronger ground if I had drawn the comparison to pianofortes instead of Harpsichords, so you have a point here. Also, I would ask that we consider the comparison between a leather plectra harpsichord, and a bright,(read brassy), concert piano, ( of the sort that schools often have ). The overtone comparison here may be far different. (Bill) <snip> there are historical documents that indicate that there was an intent to reduce the over-all number of beat rates so that the temperament itself (in the more common 50% of keys) is inherently more harmonious than equal temperament. (Ed) Again, this makes sense to me, and is the reason that the Young is my "universal solvent" when it comes to melting the calcified sense of tonality that ET has caused. { OK, I got this bias, see? it had to come out somewhere, Equal temperament is only one of many ways to tune a keyboard, and even if some regard it as a realized ideal, others, (me, if no one else), think of it as a dead end, scientific detour on the road to harmony) (Bill) What IS different about music played on pianos is that it is often more modern music that is written in key signatures of more that three sharps or flats-- THAT may be what is heard as more harsh in an historical temperament. What do you think? (Ed) It is best, IMHO, to restrict the tunings to music of an approximate era in which the tuning perhaps was in use. Virtually all the 20th Cen. music I have heard sounds worse on a well temperament. I was speaking strictly of matching temperaments with their particuar period of music. I once had a duo piano team use my small shop for a practise studio. I had two small Steinway grands in there at once, and they were well tempered. The Beethoven was stunning, but the other part of the program, (Gershwin) was horrible. What I am really glad to see is the growing interest in the older tunings. (thanks OWEN!), and debate amongst us is crucial to the direction of this progress. So........ I don't know if it is a thread or a fuse, but I will offer this; Modern music sounds as out of tune on well temperament as Mozart does on equal temperament. ( Perhaps a small glowing ember here on the cyber-hearth to see us into winter??) Regards to all, Thank you Bill for writing, Ed Foote Precision Piano Works Nashville, Tn
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC