It was reassuring recently to read that there are other adult technicians who spend time at their action models. I am always finding excuses to tinker with mine. Some time ago, after watching my model go through perhaps 100k repetitions of its cycles, it began to dawn upon me that, when the key is depressed, all movement in the action is up except for one part. That part is the front of the key and it goes down. During the last month or so there has been a lot of discussion about physics, but I have not seen gravity mentioned. Let us briefly review a few of the things we know about gravity: a. Gravity assists things going down b. Gravity impedes going up c. Gravity does both these things with a force of mass times acceleration (F=ma) where a is gravitational acceleration (g),therefore F=mg And: d. Inertia (proportional to mass) impedes everything that tries to accelerate Applying these principles to the up and down movements of the piano action, one begins to suspect that gravity has a curiously unbalanced effect. When a key is depressed, gravity and inertia impede all motion in the action exept the motion of the front of the key which: 1. gravity assists more than inertia impedes at accelerations less than g 2. gravity assists less than inertia impedes at accelerations greater than g 3. the quantity of these effects increases as the mass of the key increases 4. the quantity of these effects increases as the key acceleration increases Let us assume two things: e. that the range of accelerations (the "acceleration envelope") imposed upon the key during playing includes g f. that the dynamic level of a note increases as the acceleration of the key increases This means that a pianist will give the key less than g (>g) during pianissimo playing and greater than g (<g) during fortissimo playing. In order to help clarify what this means to the pianist, we can consider the effects of adding and removing a lead weight at the front of the key: Adding a lead weight to a given key will do these two things: 5. it will >decrease< the force required to play pianissimo (more assist @ <g) 6. it will >increase< the force required to play fortissimo (more impede @ >g) The acceleration envelope expands at both ends. Removing a lead weight from the key will do these two things: 7. it will >increase< the force required to play pianissimo (less assist @ <g) 8. it will >decrease< the force required to play fortissimo (less impede @ >g) The acceleration envelope shrinks at both ends. Restating 5-8 in more general terms: 9. the more mass on the front of the key, the wider the acceleration envelope 10. the less mass on the front of the key, the narrower the acceleration envelope. For those who have conducted their own investigations along these lines, I would like to clarify a couple of points: h. this discussion is strictly qualitative, nothing has been quantified i. we are considering the effects of gravity and inertia on the movement of the key indepently of other movements in the action; we are treating the action as nothing more than a constant mass that the key must move. The results are surprising and, as is often true, raise more questions than they answer. Please excuse me for stopping short of drawing conclusions until after comments. Bob Hohf
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC