[CAUT] Fwd: S&S M Strike point

Ron Nossaman rnossaman at cox.net
Sun Dec 23 22:43:03 MST 2012


On 12/23/2012 8:47 PM, Bob Hull wrote:
> That would be fine.  I already know about shank length, bore distance,
> the line from 72 to 88 etc.... I just want to know what the spec is on
> intended strike point on string #1.

Hi Bob,
Sorry, I don't have that number, but what JD outlined is just what you 
need to make it fit and work. Even if the action has been rebuilt 
before, the stack should still be in the original position and should be 
able to provide measurements to the hammer flange centers at both ends 
both in height and fore and aft as a target for the replacement. Or if 
you can verify the shank length is to spec, you can mark and measure the 
strike point accurately from the old stack. If this is the piano in 
which I did the belly for you this spring, treble string heights are now 
considerably more uniform than they were when it was built, so that 
ought to at least simplify setup and hammer boring some.
Ron N


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC