[CAUT] Hammer-Lac

David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net
Thu Feb 18 16:08:04 MST 2010


Remember though it depends on the solids solution.  Steinway lacquer is lo
solids and so a stronger solution was used.  Off the shelf lacquers can be
higher solids content and so will require a weaker solution.

 

David Love

www.davidlovepianos.com

 

From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Mccoy,
Alan
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:57 PM
To: CAUTlist
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Hammer-Lac

 

Back in 1990 when I did the tone seminar the whole hammer was being soaked
(with 6:1 as I recall).

Alan


-- Alan McCoy, RPT
Eastern Washington University
amccoy at ewu.edu
509-359-4627 (message Pacific time)
509-999-9512 (cell Pacific time)



  _____  

From: Fred Sturm <fssturm at unm.edu>
Reply-To: CAUTlist <caut at ptg.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:02:57 -0800
To: CAUTlist <caut at ptg.org>
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Hammer-Lac


On Feb 18, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Laurence Libin wrote:

Are you sure that Steinway still dopes the entire hammer?
Laurence


Yes, the whole set of hammers is dipped in lacquer prior to being cut apart.
Unless that changed within the past year, which seems unlikely. They started
doing that maybe 3-4 years ago.
This is before the voicer does anything in the way of adding lacquer.
Previously, it was pretty standard procedure for the voicer to soak the
whole set, after having listened to it. Meaning utterly saturate. Exactly
how many years that was standard, I don't know. I don't believe it was
standard as recently as 30 years ago.
 
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
fssturm at unm.edu




 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100218/4e08ecfd/attachment.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC