I was being a bit facetious about the placebo effect in the sense of perceived change in tone but not in the sense of a cure for the problem. I wasn't really my goal to start a thread on the placebo effect. That aside, anytime you change the contact point on the bridge by tapping or pressing or pulling or bending you'll likely get some change in the sound. That change may be a positive one, or not (it doesn't always work). If the bridge pin is notched and is the cause of the tonal problem (which it can be) then tapping the string down away from that notch can improve things, at least temporarily. Eventually, and often quickly, the string will want to straighten and find its way back to the notch in the bridge pin. That's why some people prefer to tap the bridge pin rather than the string (knowingly or not), because it moves the bridge pin notch down closer to the bridge cap and unifies those two contact points. However, because of the clamping effect of the pin on the string it can also simply further indent the edge of the bridge so that during the next humidity cycle the problems will either reappear or, if the humidity rises, further damage that edge. So the question really is whether it's a permanent fix and and/or whether it doesn't create more problems in the long run by incurring even further damage to the edge of the bridge top. My experience is that the fix is at best temporary, at worst it doesn't work and just encourages more aggressive tapping operating under the belief that it should work and thereby creating more problems. If the problem is flagpolling then it doesn't work because tapping the pin down won't stop the flagpolling problem. In that case there are other remedies that can be considered. At least that's my take on it. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Fred Sturm Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:40 AM To: caut at ptg.org Subject: Re: [CAUT] Thank you for Stability advice On Feb 8, 2010, at 12:41 PM, David Love wrote: The placebo effect refers generically to the patient believing that a fix has been administered. snip Why should strings need to be encouraged to touch the bridge surface when you have bridge pins at a 20 degree angle clamping them to the bridge. If the bridge is indented at the edge from aggressive string seating or cycles of expansion and squeezing the string against the bridge pin and the bridge top I suppose a massage of the string might push it down against the bridge surface temporarily, but it's likely to be pretty temporary. Hi David, A fair number of people believe that tapping bridge pins and "seating strings" on the bridge (by various means) has a positive sonic effect. Maybe 15-20 years or so ago, when somebody writing in the PTJ was promoting, I did a fair bit myself, and can testify that it often gave obvious results. And there are still a number of people teaching these techniques (I think Bill Spurlock continues to teach lightly tapping pins, and Wally Brooks recommends tapping strings, for example). And I think they are right in saying that it has an effect, not just "in the mind" as is implied by the word placebo: in many cases, the tone color is cleaned up and false beats are reduced or eliminated. I also agree with you that it is temporary. Seems that many of those who swear by these various techniques do it as a matter of course, every time they see the piano. Hmmmm. Looks like a vicious cycle to me. I don't think it has to be all that aggressive to create the condition where there will be a recurring gap between string and bridge surface at the notch, resulting in recurring sonic results. The problematic mental image is the notion that strings "ride up" bridge pins and need to be re-seated. This is the concept Ron N has spent so much effort trying to combat, with limited success. Strings could certainly ride up vertical bridge pins, other conditions being favorable (could possibly be an issue with Wapin, for instance), but not angled pins in the standard configuration. In any case, I don't think the word placebo is appropriate. I would describe it instead as giving a drug which masks symptoms, but has a long term effect of exacerbating the condition. Otherwise, I agree with your assessment. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100209/6db0ae94/attachment-0001.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC