On Apr 20, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Laurence Libin wrote: > Fred's qualifiers "reasonable" and "fairly refined" get to the crux. > To my thinking ET is a very precise condition, not a spectrum, and > any approximation therefore isn't ET. Like, you can't be a little > bit pregnant; either you are or you aren't (well, not you, Fred). > Referring way back in this discussion, I reiterate my opinion that > ET is an ideal (like any other precise system) often compromised > unintentionally or deliberately in practice, and I believe this has > always been true. Whether or how much the deviations matter in music > performance is something else again. And that is precisely what I was talking about considerably earlier in this thread: at what point do variances become significant? If we are talking about UETs with a shape, at what point to the differences that make up that shape become significant? My own take is that, in fact, ET is simply a practical solution to the "tuning problem" that distributes the problems evenly. And that in practical application, it doesn't need to be scientifically precise to serve its purpose. I believe ET should be seen as a fairly wide spectrum. In fact, I am tending to believe "Representative Victorian Moore" should be considered a variant of ET, as I have found nobody yet who can distinguish it in a blind test from ET (blind test listening to recordings of the same music in both tunings). Musicians don't agonize over tuning. They are careful, but not obsessive. If you ever hear a violinist working and working to get the fifths precise within one cent, you know you are watching an amateur. Professionals do what is good enough, rapidly and securely. So do other musicians. On the piano, we need to obsess on unisons in particular, because they affect the tone color and other attributes. We don't need to obsess as much over the temperament, but we do because we have been told that when we get it perfect, that is noticeably better. Experience tends to show that this is not the case, that nobody notices (within certain parameters, of course). Regards, Fred Sturm fssturm at unm.edu http://www.youtube.com/fredsturm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100420/420871d9/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC