[CAUT] Proposed Admendment to PTG ByLaws

[Chris Solliday]

well someone had to say "nay"
Chris Solliday
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Brekne" <ricb at pianostemmer.no>
To: <caut at ptg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Proposed Admendment to PTG ByLaws


> I agree this belongs on PTG-L... but as I don't subscribe I'll post just 
> a quick reply here for your edification.
> 
> I've recently come to the conclusion that organizations such as the PTG 
> have no chance of ever really providing any kind of real accreditation 
> for skills, let alone provide any kind of mechanism for 
> dis-accreditation for appropriate disciplinary cases. As long as that is 
> the case we should really be concentrating all our resources in simply 
> providing educational resources and encouragements for our membership... 
> period. F.eks. the conventions and seminars we arrange.
> 
> I have lots of reasonings I could put behind the above... but I'll let 
> it stay at this.  This is not meant to start any great "Quals" debate so 
> any one who feels the need to reply is encouraged to just email me 
> privately.
> 
> Cheers
> RicB
> 
> 
>