[CAUT] Sperrhake Harpsichord wire

[Zeno Wood]

More, more!

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> wrote:

> Fred Sturm wrote:
>
>     Okay, I thought you had looked at the formula for breaking point in
>> Rhodes, and were saying it was the same as Sanderson and/or Hays.
>>
>
> Fred, how does "My numbers correspond to yours for the Rhodes formula"
> possibly translate into me claiming that they were the same as the Sanderson
> and/or Hays formulas? You aren't making sense at all. Are you all right?
>
>
>  So IOW whatever Rhodes is using to get at breaking point is inconsistent
>> with Sanderson/Hays/etc.
>>
>
> Yes Fred, those are the very words. Now that you yourself have spoken the
> words, can you accept that you, personally, are absolutely correct, that
> break% does not, indeed, change with a change in wire size in spite of
> others' intuitive belief that it does?
>
> Congratulations. You've won.
> Ron N
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091207/5541aba0/attachment-0001.htm>