Fred Sturm wrote: > Okay, I thought you had looked at the formula for breaking point in > Rhodes, and were saying it was the same as Sanderson and/or Hays. Fred, how does "My numbers correspond to yours for the Rhodes formula" possibly translate into me claiming that they were the same as the Sanderson and/or Hays formulas? You aren't making sense at all. Are you all right? >So IOW > whatever Rhodes is using to get at breaking point is inconsistent with > Sanderson/Hays/etc. Yes Fred, those are the very words. Now that you yourself have spoken the words, can you accept that you, personally, are absolutely correct, that break% does not, indeed, change with a change in wire size in spite of others' intuitive belief that it does? Congratulations. You've won. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC