On Oct 16, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Kent Swafford wrote: > I have been trying to understand Stopper for almost 2 years now. > There are some obstacles. First there are language and cultural > barriers. And second, there is the simple fact that Stopper is > trying to make money from his discoveries; his vagueness may not be > a matter of not "grasping the complexities" as much as they are > simply wishing to keep the knowledge proprietary. > > But make no mistake, Stopper's credentials are solid, and in 4 > months of intensive use of PureTuner (my nickname for Tunic > OnlyPure) I have only been able to corroborate his claims, not > refute them. > > > Kent Well, having no personal experience beyond your posted sound files, I defer to your judgment. And I am certainly willing to make allowances for cultural and other differences leading to misunderstanding. OTOH . . . Stopper's claims are a pretty high threshold. He claims that his tuning system is superior to all others. He makes no bones about that. Are you saying that you corroborate that? Or are you saying that he has created a piece of software that produces good, even excellent tunings on a wide range of instruments. What I have read so far is the latter, not the former. You have said that TOP (I think that's a better nickname) tunings have held up to the scrutiny of your school of music/conservatory. The same can be said for tunings produced in a number of ways by each of the "big 4" ETDs as well as aurally. Are you saying that, in your opinion, your tunings produced using TOP are superior to your previous tuning? Have you had any feedback from faculty/students/others, solicited or not, to confirm this? You have said that TOP produces bass octaves sometimes wider and sometimes narrower than you would normally use, and essentially said that they were acceptable. Would you say that the result (overall, if you like, over the whole instrument) is superior? You noted the way in which the tunings of the D and the Bosey coincided nicely, and that each was a excellent tuning on its own instrument. Would you also say that the tuning for each instrument was superior to any tuning you had done previously on that instrument? I don't mean to be "aggressively badgering," I am interested to know your honest opinion. Stopper isn't at all shy about his claims. I'd also be very interested in your response to Ed Sutton's questions. I'll add one: pitch change function? Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC