Richard: The difference between the 12th root of 2 and the 19th root of 3 is 6.297037897993807971388553887547e-5 or 0.00006297037897993807971388553887547. I can't tune that precisely but maybe you can. :-) dp David M. Porritt, RPT dporritt at smu.edu -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Richard Brekne Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 4:35 PM To: caut at ptg.org Subject: [CAUT] P-12ths was: Tuning a Steinway D and a Bosendorfer Imperial together Hi Kent I don't understand why anyone would assume that the mathematical model for 19 tone to the P12 equal temperament would be followed any more closely in practice than that of the 12 tone to the octave equal temperament. I dont think I am assuming anything. Its just a fact that if you take the 19th root of 3 and split up the 19 tones of the 12th and compare it to what you get if you split an octave in that same range up into 12 equal parts using the 12th root of 2 then you will get slightly different frequencies for the 12 notes in the octave. Indeed... if there was to be given any credence at all to the idea that a P-12th tuning could sound any better (read different) then some difference would have to be present. When we tune 12 tone to the octave ET we modify the tuning for aesthetic reasons and to deal with the change in inharmonicity across the scale and to tune the treble as sharp as we like to hear. Same thing with the P12th ET. No arguement there... except one is using different tuning priorities... which of course yield somewhat different effects. There is no magic to Stoppers programs. He just bases his tuning on assuring P12ths...... which I dont believe is exactly and strictly speaking an ET tuning..... but thats another matter. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC