[CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists

Ed Sutton ed440 at mindspring.com
Fri Nov 21 06:11:29 PST 2008


So far I've installed Abel Naturals on S&S M and B, M &H BB, Boesendorfer 6' and Yamaha U-1. Good results on all. No hardening needed beyond ironing and playing. Very moderate shoulder needling after installation, no preliminary needling. They "play in" quickly. Two customers have made appointments for return voicing, then called back in a week saying "They're perfect now, don't you dare touch them!"  The S & S B gets heavy use, and is still not too bright after a year. (I spritz with rubbing alcohol and brush very lightly after a tuning.) It had impossible zings in the first capo section. With the Naturals, I was able to remove the cloth from the front duplex.

On smaller pianos I trim the bass hammers about .3mm on each side before boring and tapering.

Caveats: Abel has always been my favorite. I like the range of timbres I can get, and power without clang. My hands hurt, trying to needle Renners to get what I want, and I've done only a few S & S sets back in the puffball days.

Ed Sutton

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chris Solliday 
  To: caut at ptg.org 
  Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:43 AM
  Subject: Re: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists


  It's alittle late but having arrived at your predicament on 7 8 and 9 foot pianos in bigger rooms I wished I could have gone back and put on wider hammers. I do now and feel I have a better voicing foundation. I do like R Wurzens but for smaller situations now. JMHO
  Chris Solliday
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Paul T Williams 
    To: caut at ptg.org 
    Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 6:08 PM
    Subject: Re: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists



    Thanks, Jim 


    I'm having trouble with my Ronsen Wurzens on my Baldwin D, but am scared to start putting stuff on the crown.  I've used 4:1 Laquer/Acetone a bunch on the shoulders (middle down to the bottom)  with no improvement on power.  The false beats are gone and the sustain is great after installing Wapin on it, but I fear a lot of the problem may be a tired soundboard.  If I were to add a 5:1 or 4 or 3:1 on the crown, or nearly on the crown, am I endangering the situation? Or, would you suggest putting any straight on the crown?  The mezzo-forte on down to very ppp or pppp...the piano is lovely and the notes sing and carry to the back of the recital hall(that seats 750), but there's just no power. 

    What do you, or any of you suggest my next play??? 

    Thanks 

    Paul 



          Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu> 
          Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org 
          11/20/2008 02:44 PM Please respond to
                caut at ptg.org 


         To "caut at ptg.org" <caut at ptg.org>  
                cc  
                Subject Re: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists 

                

         



    Paul, 
      
    I’m using 5/1 with these hammers. Kent suggested 5/1, since they already had 3/1. 
      
    Jim 
      
    From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Paul T Williams
    Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:45 PM
    To: caut at ptg.org
    Subject: Re: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists 
      

    Jim, 

    What is your juice ratio you now use with these new S&S hammers? 

    Paul 


          Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu> 
          Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org 
          11/20/2008 12:05 PM 


                Please respond to
                caut at ptg.org 


         
                To "caut at ptg.org" <caut at ptg.org>  
                cc  
                Subject Re: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists 

            

                


         




    Hi Dennis, 
     
    The voicing procedure today at the factory is vastly different than say 2 years ago. I think you’d be surprised at how quickly the hammers can now be voiced/juiced. 
     
    Last month I attended the Steinway Tone Building Seminar and came away with a few ideas I might share. 
    1.       I like now like Steinway hammers and the way they voice. (Previously, not so much) 
    2.       The hammers can be ready to play in three voicing sessions. The Steinway C&A guys do it all the time. 
    3.       They are now pre-juiced more than before. My understanding is that the pre-voicing consists of literally soaking the hammer in a tray. 
    4.       You voice for two things “Body”, by applying MUCH less than before to the shoulders ( a few drops at a time) , and “Attack”, by adding only 3 drops at a time (3/1) to the crown. 
    5.       Single needle through the strings right in a “too bright” string mark 
    6.       More juice where needed as above.  Carefully listening, a drop here and there… 
    7.       Sand/mate, etc. etc. as before 
     
    They are using MUCH less juice in this stage than previously used because the hammers have far more in the factory -juicing phase. For instance, a small bottle (4 oz?) is now used which lasts through the whole procedure. We used to put 3 or 4 times that much, pouring it in!. Now it’s a matter of only a few drops at a time, judiciously applied. 
     
    Of course, trying to condense down the whole week into one small post can’t quite hit the mark, but these two things I want to stress; 1. I like it (didn’t before) and 2. A  much more surgical approach is taken. 
     
     
    Hope that helps Dennis. 
     
    Jim Busby BYU 
     
     
    From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Johnson
    Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:31 PM
    To: College and University Technicians
    Subject: [CAUT] tone building for impatient pianists 
     
    Hi-

    Some recent experiences lead me to inquire how others may deal with certain impatient expectations regarding tone building on new hammers, specifically S&S hammers that require extra juicing in the treble.  This is all standard procedure, but generally my experience shows that the best results are achieved not quickly but through a combination of playing in, hardeners and needles over a bit of time.  Unfortunately, the event calender rarely allows for optimal time.  Do you send a memo to everyone explaining all this?  I've had similar problems as related to instability on a newly restrung piano being required for certain events before it is ready.  

    Thanks,   but having a bad day-

    Dennis Johnson 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20081121/3f24f10d/attachment.html>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC