On Nov 12, 2008, at 10:51 PM, Ron Nossaman wrote: > The lower the struts are, the closer to the plane of string tension > they are, which I'd call a good idea from a structural standpoint. Here you are talking about "good plate design," a design in which the bottom of the struts is close to the plane between hitch and capo, and there isn't much tolerance. That is one part of the picture. The other part of the picture is the soundboard and how it moves with humidity. I see no problem with the scenario that bridge pins are jammed against struts with an unloaded board, as long as this isn't an accidental result of having set bearing when the board was dry and at minimum crown. The word "accidental" being the operative word here. If it is planned, and that is producing the results you want, great! If you aren't paying attention and getting results that are all over the place, well, that's a different matter. Maybe you want results that are all over the place. ("You" being a generalized word, not directed at anyone in particular here). I've just always thought it would make sense to control humidity/ equilibrium moisture content at the point of production where bearing is set. In the factories I have visited, that didn't seem to be the case. Maybe I missed something. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC