I'm not convinced...I've only installed a couple of sets, but I'm not sure if I like the impact of the harder punching... David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, CA 94044 ----- Original message ---------------------------------------- From: "Jim Busby" <jim_busby at byu.edu> To: "College and University Technicians" <caut at ptg.org> Received: 5/19/2008 11:38:59 AM Subject: Re: [CAUT] 3/4" front rail cloth punchings >Paul, >No matter what the set it is/was, I'd consider replacing it with the "Crescendo" >punchings. (Wertzen felt. Way better.) The testing committee is now specifying >these for action models in testing. We replace them and pianists say how much >better the touch is. >Regards, >Jim Busby BYU >________________________________ >From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Paul T >Williams >Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 7:30 AM >To: College and University Technicians >Subject: [CAUT] 3/4" front rail cloth punchings >Hi all, >I, by accident, ordered some sets of front rail cloth punchings but received 3/4" >diameter. I might want to send them back, but I was wondering if there is a huge >difference in the feel over the 1" dia. punchings? I assume the 3/4" dia. are for >uprights, but aren't upright keys' widths pretty close to the same as grands? I know >there are slight variances from make to make be their original design of the width >from the width of the whole keyframe. 3/4 would probably be required for 7/8th >size keyboards, but why do they really make two sizes? >Thanks for your ever-ending wisdom :>) >Paul
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC