In short, no, I don't work 80 hours/wk. Not even close: I have small children at home, and they are to me a joy beyond description. I am working a bit harder than I'd like ideally, but it is my choice to take care of some extraordinary expenses mostly out of current funds. UW approval is tacit. We are here to get the job done. We don't "keep up with all those pianos at UW". That's completely impossible with the current staffing level. I choose to find it amusing when someone holds to that delusion. What we do is to do the very best job we can on the jobs that we do. If anyone wants more of same, all they have to do is come up with the money. We have developed priorities that are sufficient to keep complaints to a minimum. Though I'm quite happy to tactfully point out the absurd staffing levels we have if someone does complain. A favorite quote (add the New York accent): "It's not my problem, I don't know nuttin about it, and I got nuttin' to do with it." I think I might be willing to take on "keeping up with all those pianos" if the staffing level were according to Steinway's spreadsheet. And the pay was about twice what it is. I do enjoy the luxury of having a thriving private business, after starting up twice. So I can, in fact, walk any time it suits me. I'd rather not, but I know I can. I do also know how to make Steinway pianos really work. They love that part. Doug On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Paul T Williams wrote: > > Doug, > > Do you work 80 hours/week? Does UW approve of this? how can you > keep up with all those pianos at UW?? Where's your family time? I > realize that you have another tech on the job, but, man, how do you > do it? > > pw > > > Douglas Wood <dew2 at u.washington.edu> > Sent by: caut-bounces at ptg.org > 06/25/2008 04:06 PM > Please respond to > College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org> > > To > College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org> > cc > Subject > Re: [CAUT] Louisiana State SOM Position > > > > > > I'd like to add a few words. I still have a private business that > brings in several times the amount the University currently pays. > When I took on the position, I asked my tax person--a CPA > "enrolled", who specializes is small businesses--about how to > compare business income and salary. As has been pointed out here, > it is not a simple matter. But he said it was actually a very good > comparison to look at the "adjusted gross income" figure, bottom > line, first page of the 1040, to compare with the stated salary of > the position. After mulling it over the last 5 years, I have to > agree with him. > > Unfortunately, it confirms that the salaries are more often than > not an insult to our profession. What to do about that is a subject > for another post. > > But I will say that I have taken the position, and remain in it for > a long list of reasons. If any one of them changed in a significant > way, I would most likely resign, and go back to spending less time > at work for more money. > > The biggest single source of lack of power in this institution is > the fear about being able to get health insurance. Not its cost, > its availability. I do hope that we will wake up to the reality > that our system is failing us very badly and do something about it. > > Doug > > > On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Porritt, David wrote: > > Jeff: > > I was gently trying to mention that you should not categorize all > college jobs as the same. If the situation at USC is as you > describe then you are right to leave and lodge a protest. I’m just > saying not all jobs are like it is at USC. My pay suits me, the > benefits are very good, I work 37.5 hours a week and have plenty of > vacation and holiday time paid. > > You said: “I don't mean to pick on Dave and I really do rebutt his > response with all due respect, but his post epitomizes why > university salaries are what they are. University positions are > being taken primarily by either singles or empty nesters who don't > require as much income. That mischaracterizes the market for our > skill.” Jeff, this is the “Market” at work. We all go for the > positions that have the benefits we want. No one gets it all. If > high income is your goal you have to find the positions, jobs or > careers that offer that. Everyone can choose the job they want, or > the pay they want, but not both. This choice is always a > compromise between many criteria. That’s free enterprise at work. > When I was younger, more energetic and less experienced I worked > hard as an independent tech. I made good money and handled it > well. Now I’m old (68) and less energetic but more experienced so > I’m doing what I do now – happily. > > I hope you can find the right situation – a satifying nitch in our > profession that pays well so that when you’re my age you don’t have > regrets. > > dave > > David M. Porritt, RPT > dporritt at smu.edu > > From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf > Of Jeff Tanner > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:54 AM > To: College and University Technicians > Subject: Re: [CAUT] Louisiana State SOM Position > > Yes. I think that is being a doormat. > > First of all, I did NOT quit in anger. I finally gave up the fight > and my colleages across the country who are content with less were > no help. I quit because I was basically told that the only way to > get change is to be the catalyst for it. I quit because the carrot > being dangled out there kept moving farther and farther away. When > I'd catch up to it and ask for the reward, the carrot moved again. > > As employees, it is encumbent upon each one of us to insist on > salaries that are more reflective of the value of what we do, > because it affects everyone else who pursues this work. Yes, if we > just accept what they want to offer and be happy with it, that's > being a doormat, as a collective whole, because we owe it to our > colleagues elsewhere to help support their earnings ability. Our > profession is quite unique in this way. We are so isolated and job > openings occur relatively infrequently compared to other > professions and so we must band together in some way to benefit the > whole. We are as strong as our weakest link, and as long as we > have qualified technicians who accept lower salaries because they > don't share the same perspective on economic issues, then we are a > weak chain. > > Different perspective on economic issues? Either we have a market > or we don't. If we are going to market our profession as one that > earns a good living (see the PTG brochure on becoming a piano > technician), it is incumbent upon us to support that, even if we do > not require it ourselves. Just because one person can live on a > lower salary is not the reason to accept it. There are others who > depend on our profession to actually earn a living. The reason > Wim's son, the CPA makes half a million is because other CPAs have > worked to increase the market value of their profession. If other > CPA's just said, "I'm at a point in life I can live on $50K," then > that's what that market would evolve towards. In the private > sector, if we have a market of technicians who have built their > businesses based on a certain tuning fee, and you have new people > move into the market tuning for half price, in a climate where the > costs of everything else continues to go up, that is an example of > how people in your own profession are cutting their own throats. > > I really don't hear from my self-employed friends who stay busy > full time that they'd like to increase their workload and earn half > of what their making. Many of our colleages would like to do a > college job, but see the pay as degrading to their skill level and > hard work. These college jobs keep coming open over and over and > over not because we have different perspectives on economic issues, > but because the work requires twice the effort for half the pay. > > If the trade offs were equitable, I could agree with you. But > after the trade-offs, we're still 10's of thousands apart (about > $30K or so). Wim's example was misleading because it didn't figure > in the costs to the employee, nor the tax advantages of being self- > employed. > > As I said, I left my position, in part, for the benefit of the > profession. The next person who comes here will enjoy a higher > salary band. Yes, I'm frustrated that they made no effort to do > that for me, but it was made fairly clear that the only way that > change could be made was if I turned in my resignation. That's > just the way the system works. I suppose I could reapply for the > position, but I've put too much effort into creating something for > me to land on when I resigned that I can't go back now. > > I remember well the pressures of a house payment, kids in school, > etc. and I’m glad I’ve lived past that. > > Not all the rest of us are financially independent. You must have > gotten to that point during your years you speak of as a self- > employed tech. If I'd stayed on at the university, we'd never have > lived past that. You imply that you are "past" a house payment. > Our was getting bigger because of the insufficiency of the salary. > I don't know your age, but I know that the costs of basic > necessities compared to earnings is not what it was even 20 years > ago. There was no way we could have continued, and I know how to > live cheap. > > My take-home is not as great as my former gross receipts as an > independent tech, but somehow I’m living as well or better. > > Well, you must have gotten everything paid for as a self-employed > tech before you switched to being an employee. > > If anything, because of that inequity alone, we owe it to the next > generation of piano technicians to do our part to support the > market for their work. If we approach it with, "I can live cheaper > now", that is letting our next generation down, let alone those > across the country who'd like to be able to pay their bills now. > > These university positions are unique jobs and they clearly are not > for everyone but some of us weirdos are pretty happy doing it. > > It sounds obvious that you'd like to keep it that way. > > I suppose if we worked to get the salaries up, we might have some > competition for our jobs. > > I don't mean to pick on Dave and I really do rebutt his response > with all due respect, but his post epitomizes why university > salaries are what they are. University positions are being taken > primarily by either singles or empty nesters who don't require as > much income. That mischaracterizes the market for our skill. It > undermines the CAUT committee's efforts to establish a CAUT > endorsement and creates a model that makes it impossible for those > of us who are family breadwinners to be able to fit in. > > If that is the collective will of the incumbents in these > positions, then that is fine. But rather than wasting the CAUT > committee's time on creating an endorsement that should have the > effect of improving earnings, let's just put out a statement that > says that "Full Time college technician positions are not intended > for people who want to work hard and improve their skills and earn > a good salary. They are for people who don't require much money to > live." > Jeff > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Porritt, David > To: College and University Technicians > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:29 AM > Subject: Re: [CAUT] Louisiana State SOM Position > > Jeff: > > I hope you’re not saying that those of us who are happy with what > we are doing, and have a different perspective on economic issues, > and are aware of whatever trade-offs are involved and don’t quit in > anger are doormats. I remember well the pressures of a house > payment, kids in school, etc. and I’m glad I’ve lived past that. > SMU has an excellent retirement program (I contribute 5%, they > contribute 10%) I have good health benefits, I work with great > musicians who are also delightful human beings, I perceive that I > am appreciated and my last raise confirms it. My take-home is not > as great as my former gross receipts as an independent tech, but > somehow I’m living as well or better. > > I’m really glad you’ve made the decision to leave USC as it’s been > obvious that you have been unhappy for a long time. These > university positions are unique jobs and they clearly are not for > everyone but some of us weirdos are pretty happy doing it. I hope > your independent business picks up quickly and that you earn the > lifestyle you want and need. > > dave > > David M. Porritt, RPT > dporritt at smu.edu > > From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf > Of Jeff Tanner > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:52 AM > To: College and University Technicians > Subject: Re: [CAUT] Louisiana State SOM Position > > Yes, I became bitter over time as I realized I'd been lied to and > misled about the future. I was committed to the university and > there was no reciprocal commitment. That will make anyone bitter. > But if it paid enough to live on and there had been a commitment > from the administration for a real program of maintenance beyond > telling the guy they hired to just work harder, I would have been > quite happy to stay there on and on. > > But the point is, the earnings situation around the country isn't > going to get any better until we start standing up for ourselves. > As long as we are doormats, that is how we will be treated. If we > want to change it, it starts with us. So, that's what I did. > > If you don't want to see change, just keep on with the status quo. > Jeff > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Willem Blees > To: caut at ptg.org > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:02 PM > Subject: Re: [CAUT] Louisiana State SOM Position > > Jeff > > I'm sorry you are so bitter about your job at USC, and I hope you > find what you're looking for. > > Peace > Wim > > Doug Wood > > School of Music > University of Washington > Doug Wood School of Music University of Washington -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20080625/5828988f/attachment-0001.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC