On 6/10/07 10:46 AM, "Bob Hohf" <rhohf at centurytel.net> wrote: > I think we should avoid going the way of today's climate scientists. They > have unbelievable tools to play with, and can generate and crunch huge > mounds of data. The problem I have with them is that they expect us to > believe they know how to predict the climate when they can't even forecast > the weather. Actually, I have the opposite take: They are actively gathering enormous mounds of data of all sorts and working to put it all together into an, admittedly, impossibly complex system. When it comes to a relatively simple thing like pianos and humidity change and pitch change, we mostly just spout based on anecdotal evidence, and/or calculations (some based on reliable formulae and models, others suspect, to say the least), and we do next to no real hard gathering of data. I would love to see even a minimal emulation of today's climate scientists with respect to pianos<G>. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC