I think it's not so much the bass bridges as it is the tension and break point percentages of the various sections. The degree to which a string goes out of tune will be a function of the break point percentage (BPP) when it is at pitch (thanks Ron N. for clarifying that). The lower the BPP, the greater the change in pitch for a given change in length. The top end of the bass section is generally considerably higher BPP than the low tenor, and the low tenor is usually the lowest BPP in the entire piano and thus goes out of tune the most with seasonal changes. David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com -----Original Message----- From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hohf Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 2:34 PM To: 'College and University Technicians' Subject: Re: [CAUT] pre-stretching new string? I've been following this discussion with some interest, and don't have any strong opinions or data on one side or the other of the soundboard/bridge debate. However, I'd be interested in how the various factions explain the difference in humidity-related pitch change between the treble and bass bridges. We've all observed the same sort of difference with both solid-body and cantilevered bridges, so I don't think it can be explained by simply saying, "Bass bridges have more wood, so they expand and contract more." And how about those Yamaha C3s where the lowest octave of the tenor bridge has far greater seasonal pitch swings than any other part of the scale, treble or bass? Just wondering Bob Hohf
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC