[CAUT] Verituner Pocket PC

Andrew Anderson andrew@andersonmusic.com
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:21:40 -0600


Hi,
Didn't catch your signature.  How many partials does it measure?

Andrew Anderson

At 07:30 PM 1/16/2006, you wrote:
>Greetings Ric & list:
>
>I have been using VPC for about two weeks now.  I'm using an Ipaq 
>2495 (520 mhz).  Dave Carpenter recommended this over the Dell Axim 
>I was considering as there is a substantial difference in speed due 
>to the way each machine "redraws" the screen.  Or something like 
>that.  I have found the program faster to use than the stand alone 
>VT100.  Perhaps because it's quicker to navigate/input data and 
>there is no warm-up period with the Ipaq.  The inharmonicity 
>seems  to be measured  faster, and the accuracy is the same.
>A couple of quirks need to be worked out yet:  The "measured" 
>function is not yet working, and the calibrate function requires an 
>extra step of starting a new tuning first, THEN going back to the 
>calibrate page to actually calibrate.  Dave C is aware of both of 
>these problems and is promising an update in the near future.
>Having used the six-pound VT100 for about four years, I was anxious 
>to get  the VPCand take a load out of my too-heavy tool kit.  I am 
>very happy with the new program and would recommend it to anyone 
>considering making the move.  Dave C said that he hasn't been 
>advertising it since he doesn't have the manual done yet...but that 
>anyone familiar with the VT100 will have no problem figuring the new 
>program out without it.
>Ric Brekne wrote:
>
>>Hi Folks
>>
>>I was just wondering if any of you have started using Verituner for 
>>Pocket PC and if so what comments you have on it ?
>>
>>Cheers
>>RicB
>>_______________________________________________
>>caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>>
>_______________________________________________
>caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC