For my part, I am pretty well convinced that soundboard movement/swelling is the major dimensional change affecting tuning. Large area, hygroscopically active wood, constrained around the rim. A small dimensional change gets magnified by the rim constraint to generate a large push upward (assuming crown). Cross sectional swelling by the bridge comes nowhere close. (Take an 8 1/2 x 11 sheet of paper. Hold down one end and push the other 1/4" toward the constrained end. Watch how high the middle goes up. You'll be amazed.) But it's very complex, as the push upward is countered by various twisting pressures exerted by strings (especially considering variations in waste lengths toward the hitch pins). How pitch is affected is partly determined by relative tensions (if you want some of my take on why the tenor area is often affected the most, go back about 8 years or so in the PTJ to a series of letters back and forth). Fred Sturm University of New Mexico Michael Jorgensen wrote: > > Ron, > If the bridge were most of the cause, why does the low tenor go so far > sharp? It seems to me that if the bridge uniformly grew taller, the > shorter/higher strings should change most? > -Mike
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC