I'm with Mark on this one. The only times I have used Steinway NY hammers in the past 8 or 10 years is when the owner specifies "Genuine Steinway" parts (it's their piano.) The rest of the time I use Renner and face far less work, create much better sound (my opinion) and happier customers. I've had to dope one set of Renners (on a Steinway D), other than that it is hang-'em, voice-'em, play-'em. dave *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 12/11/99 at 11:24 AM Mark Bolsius wrote: >Hi List, > >I've been following the collodion/lacquer/hardening thread for a bit with >great interest. > >Firstly, I thought I'd share what's happening at S&S Hamburg, I was there >for 6 weeks in May/June this year. > >They are still using Renner hammers made specifically for them. In the >factory, at the pre-voicing end of things: >-they level strings, >-tune, >-listen, >-shape, >-match tops to strings, >-listen, >-needle, >-lacquer (varying ratios depending on the result required of nitro-cellulose >lacquer and thinners). > >The C&A techs and the retail techs use lacquer or collodium/ether depending >on their personal preferences and the tonal result required. While I was >doing the Concert Tech Academy, George Ammann, the senior concert tech and >our instructor, prefered lacquer but in extremely thin solutions 20:1 or >more. His logic was that several applications working up to the desired >result was better than trying to work backwards from too much...I agreed >wholeheartedly! > >I'm not a great fan of using artificial means to prop up tone/power. I >prefer to work with a hammer that has too much and bring it under control. >The result is far more natural in it's tone colour and balance. > >Which brings me to a question I'd like to hear some points of view on- > >Why is it so hard to produce hammers that are hard enough? Or why don't >hammer makers do it, there are plenty of examples of good hard hammers, they >just take time to work with. > >Is that the problem, we don't have the time, so we try to make hammers that >are close to what we want and that don't need copious amounts of needling? > >I know that Renner and Steinway (Hamburg) are continually adjusting the >formula...too soft...too hard...too soft... to find the right balance. >Treading a fine line... > >I suppose it's a result of the economic approach when you have workers being >paid by piece work, they complain if they have to work too hard to achieve >the right result and the factory or the piano buyer complains if the hammers >are too soft to produce good tone/power, but the workers like it when there >is little needling to be done. > >I find the American approach of starting with a hammer that is too soft and >doping it up hard to understand...different culture I suppose? > > >Cheers >Mark Bolsius >Bolsius Piano Services >Canberra Australia > >Tuner to Canberra School of Music >Australian National University David M. Porritt dporritt@swbell.net Meadows School of the Arts Southern Methodist University Dallas, TX 75275
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC